NFPS / Private The service needs to be fixed

IPTV Private Server (NFPS)
Status
Not open for further replies.
If the thread becomes a 'bitchfest' it will be closed... again. If you have an issue with a channel, post it in the Channel Issues forum. If you have an issue with configuration (the most common cause of 'not connecting'), find the appropriate subforum and do some research, and if you can't find the answer, post your issue.
 
Last edited:
Service is and has been solid.
We been seeing a few channels that come and go as of recently, but them are just a few.
Most all other channels are working fine, except a very few that are buffering. Them are only a few as well.
I have been testing these channels hourly, for a few days now and am diligent and thorough.
Results are posted in the Sticky thread, which has been posted in the correct Channel Issues forum.

If your results are different, then yous have issues of your own or are spreading false info.

This thread is now closed.
Refer in the Channels listed in the Channel issues forum. And report your issues there in that forum as well.
I will check the reports asap
BIG assumption you judge the community by. Just because a reported channel has problem, and YOU are able to view the channel OK does not mean that everyone else
should see the channel as you do. There are many external variables (such as different servers, etc)
 
yes there is and i will be first to say that but all in all for the price and what you get its steal i know it works most of time i talk to many friends to check it out and they do know what is down and up and how long its been down this is not ez to run but for most part many are happy when you set the box up right thats the key to the whole thing for most and your internet provider could be doing it to you too so many things some are ez to fix other you need work on im not saying its you all time i get that i would be not telling the truth they mess up too or the feed they get it from really not them in that way
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.